What’s Wrong With Stephen Miller? He’s Gay.

GOSSIP OF THE WEEK!

Yeah, it’s just a guess.  But do me a favor, go get your friend with pro-grade gaydar, like I have, and ask them what they think.  Go on.  I’ll wait.

Here’s the thing, to me, everything about Miller’s speech, body language, and effected nature, screams self-hate.  In a public setting, he spits his ugly words out of his mouth and perpetually glances sideways, away from his target.  As if he doesn’t own the thoughts propelling the words, nor them him.  He is merely the messenger of the “truths”.  Not to mention, the more base fact…dude looks and acts gay.  And trust me, gay is totally fine.  It would be awesome to know Trump’s policy advisor and speech writer was openly gay, but he’s not, is he.  No, he’s exactly the opposite, and that’s bad news.

Miller was a quiet introvert in high school, until he got his hands on a copy of the hate-fest “Guns, Crime, and Freedom,” by the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre (Certified anti-gay).  There began his extroversion and directed hate.

Having decided on a hate-filled outlook on life, he dumped his good friend, because his friend was Hispanic.  Is that why he dumped his buddy?  Or was that the reason given by which to justify the action?  It’s not clear he had any real friends after that, male or female.  He became keen on writing and forcibly arguing for his hate filled views.

Stephen’s high school paper on political correctness:

“And while we are on the subject of personal accomplishment, should any student accomplish the opportunity to have sex, our school is happy to help. As district policy says: “Condoms are available to students in grades 9-12 in a manner which promotes greatest accessibility.” Problem here?

Legally speaking, sex between minors is statutory rape. Not to mention 14-year olds are a little young to be having sex regardless of the law. And just in case your son or daughter decides at their tender age that they are gay, we have a club on campus that will gladly help foster their homosexuality. Do they notify parents if their teenagers have chosen an alternate lifestyle? Of course not.”

Read the whole thing, it’s full of hate.  But here I want to highlight-

“Should any student accomplish the opportunity to have sex…,” which is a strange turn of phrase for sure in it’s active words, “accomplish,” and “opportunity.”  As in: difficult to come by and difficult to complete.  Maybe Stephen is just a wee bit jealous, hm? There is his stated fear, that if someone is gay, they might be helped to fulfill that recognition.  “Do they notify their parents…,” would it be awful if a child’s parents found out that their child was gay?  But Stephen, you presume that your parents won’t be told, so that might give you your freedom, wouldn’t it?  Isn’t that scary?

It’s not a self righteous superiority Miller feels, it’s a frightened hate of a liberal environment where he might be found out; where he might have a supportive structure to explore his fear.  An environment in which he would be known to be gay and free to accept that fact.

A quote from a Oscar de La Torre, a school board member, concerning Miller’s difficult high school years:

84c27df6-3ac3-4607-b44e-11705ce914ae.png

In his storied college career, there are several examples of Miller’s awkward interactions with women. In the column which he wrote for the Duke Chronicle he mentions interactions with women twice over the time he contributed to the paper.  In both instances women are portrayed as being insufferably stupid.  Barely tolerable.  Here and here.

He jumped into the middle of a women’s track meet to prove men were physically superior.

“jumped, uninvited, into the final stretch of a girls’ track meet, apparently intent on proving his athletic supremacy over the opposite sex.”

From the same article, Miller under the guise, again, of making a higher point, gets sexy for male colleague:

Miller “set off on a patriotic semi-striptease before the editor of the student newspaper, according to the editor, Ari Rosmarin, theatrically removing a button-down to reveal an American flag T-shirt in protest of an article he found inconsistent with the national interest.”

A list of cultural representative of the US, according to Miller: “Our culture includes Jimmy Stewart, John Wayne, Frank Sinatra, Bing Crosby, Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash, Jackie Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, Douglas Macarthur, Milton Friedman, Edgar Allen Poe, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Thomas Edison and again, for emphasis, Elvis Presley.”  Half of the population is conspicuously absent in representation.

According to Miller, “alternate lifestyles” and sexuality should not be portrayed in Hollywood productions.  We should not, cannot see it!  It will be real.

This dude is so deep, deep in the closet, that it has a basement with a dungeon in it.  This is the kind of guy so focused on self avoidance, he would spend hours and days pouring over tomes and treatise of ways in which to cultivate dissatisfaction and hate for others, as a tool by which to avoid his own self-examination.

Stephen Miller has no friends.  Zero.  He can’t stand women and he can’t stand to entertain the ways in which he likes men.

I bet he has cuts on his arms and scars on his back from self-flagellation.  I bet you.

56 thoughts on “What’s Wrong With Stephen Miller? He’s Gay.

      1. I have to agree. There are no pics of him with any female…no pics of him with anyone for that matter. Prob because he has no friends

        Liked by 1 person

  1. OK, so I’m changing the name of the accused to Bill Schumer he’s weird as hell & can shed tears faster than any hose can spray the lawn. I’ve no doubt there are a number of closet gays in the Democrats but who names them? No one but that never stopped a Democrat or their followers lying about Republicans. Miller is intelligent and has a sharp, fast wit, those who need to mention his possible sexual preference are the ones with the problem

    Like

    1. Hmm. My gadar doesn’t inform me anything about Schumer. I don’t mention my belief that Miller is gay as some kind of left field attack, I’m offering it as a reason for his ideological xenophobia and homophobia.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Offering your homophobic attack on Miller with no evidence except your opinion which is irrelevant. Most of us consider a persons sexual preferences to be personal and provided their partner is of age no business of anyone else, not something for a left wing homophobe to speculate upon. Its none of your business just as its none of my business. Evidently Miller has a sharp mind and fast wit a non swimmer should be careful not to jump in the deep end.

        Like

      2. I did say it was just my opinion, did I not? If he is gay or not does not matter. If he is homophobic and xenophobic because he is closeted, does matter. I don’t think the Citizenry should suffer for his personal, emotional issues. You say if I stated this about a Democrat, it would be a truth telling, if I say it about a Republican it would be a lie. How is that? I did offer “evidence,” if it so upsets you, offer evidence to the contrary.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. No, I didn’t say it would be right to give an opinion about either Democrat or Republican I said that doing so to Republicans is acceptable to the left and the other unacceptable by ever increasing decibels . Homosexuality is a sexual preference nothing more..

        Like

      4. “I’ve no doubt there are a number of closet gays in the Democrats but who names them? No one but that never stopped a Democrat or their followers lying about Republicans. ” That seems pretty clear cut. Now it’s a matter of degrees? I didn’t say or imply there was anything wrong with being gay. What is not acceptable is national policy being dictated by this creatures self hate.

        Like

    2. I did read what you wrote but I disagree with the very idea of drawing attention to the sexual preference of anyone provided their preference is not for children. I also disagree with the idea that a persons sexual preference would influence their politics to such an extent they would base their own actions upon it, and if you think about that you would recognise what a backward step making such connections would be.

      Like

      1. I never said sexual preference was the issue in the piece I wrote, or here in these comments. Why do you keep referring to it? You do realize of the many things Stephen Miller is against, “gay” is one of them, right?

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I AM NOT. read the article again and again. Cut and paste for me where I said he is making policy decisions based on being gay, I SAID he is making policy decisions out of self hate and is avoiding the fact he is gay.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. oh and not everything. There’s so much not likable about this cretin, I doubt being openly gay would fix everything, but it’s a start. ” )

        Liked by 1 person

      4. You can’t blame others for your own inferiority and psychological problems, not even if they’re republicans. If we all drag sexual preferences into politics and particularly elections the whole :GBTQXYZ Lesbian and trans movement are finished. The reason tolerance works is the vast majority want it to work, describing everything we dislike as homophobic in origin is childish, ridiculous and homophobic in itself!

        Like

      5. Dear lord, you’re dense. I’m not making it a GOP or dem issue, you’ve done that yourself twice now. I’m not making it a sexual preference issue, you yourself keep doing that…for god knows what reason. …for my psychological problems? I haven’t typed anything about my psychological problems yet. If one of the two of us has a problem with sexuality, that would appear to be you, from what you have just typed.

        Liked by 2 people

      1. See? You continue to think sexual preference is the issue. Now, it’s not just Miller, it’s me too, huh? What do you have against gays exactly?

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I’ve nothing against gay men, lesbian women or trans people as long as they keep their own preferences to adults and don’t try to infect children with their problems. As for this its just the usual leftie attempt to vilify a right winger

        Like

    3. Miller is full of hate..and a dirty spoiled rotten little brat that comes from money – just like Trump. I would like nothing more than to punch him in his little dirty rotten spoile brat mouth

      Liked by 3 people

  2. while arguing, would anyone mind saying “orientation” rather than “preference”. how can you think anyone CHOOSES their sexuality?? Just saying.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. You have the patience of a saint. It is clear from the post you are talking about the destructive nature of self loathing and how it can manifest itself. I figure it has to be something like that with Miller. Be well. Hugs

    Liked by 2 people

    1. You have the arrogance to presume that anyone with a different opinion to your own is suffering from some kind of mental health problem and in saying so you display your own ignorance and refusal to understand that not everyone agrees with you

      Like

      1. Dude..YOU HAVE ONLY 2 OPTIONS: LOVE OR HATE.

        Miller has been spewing hate from his mouth since high school. Today he spews the same hatred, division and racism. When God made us..he made us to emulate him in LOVE…not hate. Just because the guy is witty means nothing. LOVE OR HATE….we all have to opportunity to choose. Since you are representing for him…what does that say about you??

        Liked by 2 people

      2. The point is provided Miller’s sexual orientation is not for under age girls or boys everything else including not wanting to disclose or discuss it is up to him. Reams about the sexual orientation just because we don’t like their politics is absurd and dangerous. The vast majority of us, I can think of at least one weirdo who would love it, would be deeply embarrassed by such speculation, and as I’ve said previously on this post such unnecessary and probably untrue speculation is usually indulged in by the left wing

        Like

      3. Hi, Stephen. 🙂 If you aren’t him, you are a troll of equally high skill. And BTW, it’s not a “preference” it’s an orientation.

        Like

  4. @ pippakin , you are projecting. Try getting off your high horse and have a conversation instead of lashing out at strawman constructs. Everything you wrote to me is simply things you have done with no attempt to even understand what is being said. I don’t buy your act. Before you can have an outrage you need to know what you are being outraged at. What you are going on about was not in the comment I wrote. If you have any reading comprehension you would see I was stating what I thought the post clearly was about. Nothing more, nothing less. You added a bushel of trash into it so you could then go off in a huffy insulting rant. Be well. Hugs

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I don’t trust you anymore than I trust anyone on WordPress. I have said there is no reason to say Stephen Miller is gay or homophobic. What you and ‘Trumptimestamp are doing is projecting your own phobias onto a member of the right, you have no evidence just what you perceive in his language and body movements. Don’t be downhearted you and Trumptimestamp are not alone you are within the modus operandi of the whole American left wing movement. Its yet another case of wear these socks…And now you are interrupting a film

      Like

      1. I seen your post where you rant about WordPress. I won’t address your trust issues. That is between you and your therapist. I have no phobia about being gay dear, If you looked at my blog you would see I am very openly gay and very happy about it. What is being said by Trumptimestamp is that he thinks / believes Miller is self hating and destructively lashing out because he maybe hiding being gay. The being gay is not the issue here, it is the self hating destructive behaviors. I have no idea if miller is gay and don’t care, he could be hating some other part of his life and makeup. The result is the same destructive lashing out. Again you also lash out and attack ” the whole American left wing movement” without any need to nor do you bother to check if either of us are part of such a movement. The ending of your comment makes no sense and seems to show you blame others for your own actions. Be well. Hugs

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I know you’re gay the herding of as many people as possible under the LGBTQXYZ umbrella is well known and so is ‘if people wont get under the umbrella willingly there must be something wrong with them so drag them in anyway’ mantra.

        I didn’t comment on here to get involved in any heated debate I merely chose to give a glimpse of the under belly of the left wing and LGBTQXYZ movement Have a look at the comments…

        Like

      3. First I am not heated, but you sure do seem to be. I am trying to have a conversation. You can’t seem to do so. Your comment makes no sense and I wont bother to respond to what seems to be some kind of conspiracy theory. So have a good night with the film. Hugs

        Liked by 1 person

      4. You are doing what all left wingers do, personalising a debate to cover your own lack of any alternative suggestion.. Someone with no real evidence declares a man a closet gay who hates himself and all homosexuals. How does he know this could possibly be true or even relevant? He doesn’t, but what’s worse is you defend his right to be completely delusional and offensive about someone he doesn’t know. When I said I was watching a film it was a polite way of saying I’m going away until you grow up but you couldn’t leave it alone could you like a child you had to have the last word. I’m going away until you grow up. Its all you deserve.

        Like

      5. You sure do love to throw around accusations and labels. Your first sentence was just full of venom, and no information. You did miss the part where the author said it was his opinion?

        Yeah, it’s just a guess.

        All this time you have railed, insulted, accused, and labeled just because you seem to not understand what is written.

        I defended what the post was about while you were angry about a post you wrote, that was different than the one here and included things the author did not write. I defended the subject of the post as I already stated to you.

        When I wrote for you to enjoy the film I was being kind., polite, and courteous. You should try it sometimes. It does help with conversation.

        Now I am done responding to you. We are taking up space on someone else’s blog. We have both been heard and had our say. There is nothing more to add that would benefit the conversation. Be well and happy. Hugs

        Liked by 2 people

  5. trumptimestamp, What pippakin is doing is an age old technique (and a very poor one at that). It is simply the act of “pretending to be offended” as a means to deflect and detract from the original statement or argument being made. It is easier for him to call you a homophobe and pretend to be offended by (when most likely he is one himself) as that changes the topic of your post from its original intent. People and politicians do it all the time. Let’s pretend that this is about something else than what it was originally about. And let’s have you defend yourself and the homophobic statements you’ve made when you never made them to begin with. Now we don’t have to discuss the real issues or the real topic you’ve posted. It is best to ignore people like him. Interestingly enough the same people like pippakin who allegedly will scream that you are “anti gay” and demand your head on a platter for doing so will have no problem repeatedly voting for congressmen who consistently vote against gay rights.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. yeah, he keeps going back to his original statement that it’s all about miller being called gay and pretending to be concerned about it. Pointed this inaccuracy out several times, then he understood what I was saying…and went right back to his original crap anyways. Dude has half a brain, whatcha gonna do? : )

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Trying to tell the truth would be a start dragging someones sexual orientation into any debate is not accidental nor is it done without aim or thought. You dislike Miller so unlike anyone you do happen to like he is fair game for any and all attacks.

        Like

      2. There is nothing accidental about my premise, correct. Again, shit-for-brains, it’s not about his sexuality, it’s about his avoidance of it. Do you revel in acting stupid? Wear it like a badge of honor?

        Liked by 1 person

      3. I know you said it wasn’t accidental and I agreed…FFS. Seriously what the fuck is wrong with you? It’s not an excuse, it’s what I wrote. dear lord you are daft.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. You are a rebel without a coherent paragraph, sporting a selective 50% reading comprehension score. You’re blacklisted until such a time as you aren’t a schmuck, which I’m guess is never.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Wow, trumpsimestamp. I think you hooked the subject of your post into a delightfully transparent defense of his actions. My compliments, man. That was a thing of beauty.

    Like

  7. I think Miller looks and acts SO much like Roy Cohn. Another right-wing fascist racist bigot who happened (as it turned out) to be gay, but was so deep in the closet that when told be his doctor that he was gay, he denied it and said “I just like to fuck men” (this is actually a line from the play Angels in America so it isn’t really a Roy Cohn quote but I always thought it was probably pretty close to his actual attitude).

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Frankly I don’t care if miller is gay or not, what I do believe is that if he lived in Poland 70 years ago he would be helping the SS round up Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto. People who work with him have described him as the waffen SS. This sn’t a fair description because they were solders, not a whiny little jerk from an upper middle class family in California. 70 years ago Miller would have been a capo trying to save his own skin.

    Like

    1. I hear ya. Being gay isn’t the subject of what I wrote. Being in denial and the avoidance of being gay and the hate it causes him to manifest was the premise. : )

      Liked by 1 person

  9. His vitriol makes him the reincarnation of Roy Cohn, a self-loathing gay man. It’s really sad. Come out of the closet, Stephen, and learn to embrace your faith’s tolerance and kindness to strangers.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s